This is more of a list than a rant, since I have less time than usual this morning.
And for the record, though it's less frequent, I have seen these words misused in published fantasy.
taught, taut, taunt
The word that most fantasy authors mean is "taut," or "stretched tight." "His muscles were taut." However, I keep seeing "His muscles were taught" or worse, "taunt." A taunt is an insult or jibe, especially one that's meant to goad someone else into responding. It has nothing to do with tightness. And neither does taught; it just sounds the same.
rein, reign
I keep seeing: "He reigned in his horse." No. Rein is the word for the part of the bridle the fantasy author usually means. Reign is used in the sense of someone ruling, like a king's reign. Unless you literally mean that the rider rules over his horse, you want "He reined in his horse." This is so common that I thought at first it might be a British usage, but I have been unable to find evidence of that anywhere, so I think it's simply a really common mistake.
shinning, shining
These are two distinct words that don't sound the same. In most cases, I think it's a slipped finger in typing and a too-swift editing that's to blame. Shin as a verb means to climb by "gripping and pulling alternately with the hands and legs," to hit someone in the shins, or to move quickly on foot. Shining is the participle form of shine. Look carefully, either when you type the word or before you hit the spell-check key to accept the word.
greaves
This is "leg armor below the knee," not armor for the arms.
hauberk
Dictionary.com gives this one as "a long tunic made of chain mail." It can't be used for any old tunic, or for a surcoat; that's the tunic a knight wears over his armor, one that might bear his coat of arms to enable the audience to tell who's who in a joust.
flaunt, flout
These words are opposites, but in practice, many writers use "flaunt" for both senses. Flaunt means to show off, to blare, to blaze with color. A princess is flaunting her wealth if she wears jewels on her neck and rings on every finger. Flout means to suppress or ignore. Someone is flouting the laws if he breaks them. Many fantasy authors write "flaunt the laws," which literally means nothing and figuratively gives quite a different image than they want.
chalcedony
This is a name that people like to throw in when they're feeling really impressive, thinking it's just any old jewel name. In reality, it's a milky variety of quartz. Having armor or a sword made of chalcedony would probably be heavy.
ichor
The blood of angels. It means apparently the blood of just about everyone else, though. I would advise against using it that way. To quote Ursula K. LeGuin, it's "the infallible touchstone of the seventh-rate."
eldritch
All it really means is supernatural or eerie. There are plenty of words that do the same thing and sound less pretentious about it.
thee, thou, thy and thine
Most fantasy authors don't use the second person singular in English correctly. First of all, it's the second person familiar; "you" was actually the formal second person, the kind you would use to address a stranger. Using "thee" and "thou" to someone like a king (who isn't a friend) is inappropriate. Second, "thou" is the subject and "thee" the object.
Right: "Thou art the image of thy father." "I am with thee."
Wrong: "Thee art my enemy." "I will hunt thou down."
"Thy" is the formation that corresponds to "my," and in strictly correct terms is only used before words that do not begin with vowels or the letter h. For that you need "thine." (It corresponds to the ancient usage by which someone would say "my castle" but "mine eyes" or "mine heart.")
Right: "thy book," "thine heart," "thine enemy."
Wrong: "thine skin," "thy eyes," "thy hair."
Many people also don't know the correct verb forms to use with the second person singular, so stick -est on the end of any verb and think it works. It doesn't. This is a short list of the special verb forms.
to be
present tense: art
past tense: wert
to have
present tense: hast
past tense: hadst
Most verbs follow "know":
present tense: knowest
past tense: knew
And so on.
hath
This is third person singular present tense (though it gets used for past tense, as well as second person everything).
Right: He hath made the world.
She hath done it.
Wrong: Thou hath loved me.
He hath an old house before it was destroyed.
bay
Reddish-brown in color. Bay horses have black manes and tails. Something is not "bay" if it's black. Nor is a bay horse with a white mane and tail normal, or one with a silver mane and tail.
vermillion, vermilion
This is a bright red or orange color. For some reason, many people want to use it as a shade of green. (I suspect it might be the "ver-" prefix, which a lot of people think is the same as the one in verdant).
wrought
This is a rarer mistake, but one I thought I would mention. Wrought is one of those irregular past participles that got left behind when its verb changed, like molten, which was once identical in meaning to melted. Wrought's verb form is work. "He wroughts" and "he wroughted" do not exist.
auburn
This means reddish brown to brown, not bright red. Some fantasy authors use it interchangeably with "copper" or "scarlet" hair (themselves quite different shades). Then there are auburn eyes, which would look very strange. Decide what shade your character's hair is, and then stick to using words that could reasonably be used to describe it.
blond/blonde
This is the only adjective in English which changes with gender, I believe. Blond is for males, blonde for females. Be very careful, especially when using this to introduce a character, or you can well have half your audience thinking in the wrong direction.
Short list, but, I hope, useful.
February 6 2004, 15:27:02 UTC 9 years ago
Ichor, to me, always sounded like some kind of Lovecraftian slime.
February 6 2004, 15:55:50 UTC 9 years ago
Re:
Ichor, to me, always sounded like some kind of Lovecraftian slime.And here I always thought it was bug blood. :-)
9 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
February 6 2004, 15:28:38 UTC 9 years ago
Thanks again!
February 6 2004, 16:33:05 UTC 9 years ago
Re:
I honestly thought it was a type of weapon, not armorYou're probably thinking of "halberd", a kind of weapon that's a combination of axe and spear. I think a lot of people confuse those two.
Hmm. My (British) dictionary gives "ichor" as:
1. [Greek mythology] fluid flowing like blood in the veins of the gods
2. [poetic] bloodlike fluid
3. [historical] a watery foetid discharge from a wound, etc.
So I think there's a case for using it in the way some fantasy writers do... but, having said that, I'm definitely with Ursula K. LeGuin one this one.
9 years ago
February 6 2004, 15:47:53 UTC 9 years ago
(Which reminds me of another error -- shipWRIGHT, wheelWRIGHT, playWRIGHT. Shiprite would be either an onboard religious ceremony or a medieval FedEx company .)
February 6 2004, 21:10:08 UTC 9 years ago
Re:
I see it more often as playwrite, which always puzzles me. If you're going to get it that wrong, wouldn't you go for 'playwriter?'But yes, there are several cool verbs in English like that. Unfortunately, the only two I remember off the top of my head are "wrought" and "molten." Work and melt were once irregular verbs, and somehow when they changed to join the others, people didn't forget their old past tenses.
9 years ago
February 6 2004, 15:49:48 UTC 9 years ago
-josie
February 6 2004, 16:02:05 UTC 9 years ago
February 6 2004, 18:08:12 UTC 9 years ago
February 6 2004, 21:10:54 UTC 9 years ago
Re:
*nod* I got it from LOTR. I looked it up because I was tired of reading Tolkien's poems not knowing what half the words meant, exactly. ;)February 6 2004, 18:27:46 UTC 9 years ago
And I have a question along similar lines: "shined". To me this looks like an atrocious error along the lines of "he runned down the stairs" and "she buyed an apple". The past tense of "shine", I have always been taught, is "shone", both transitive and intransitive. "He shone with an inner light." "She shone the torch into the room." However, I've seen it used in published texts, several times, and I was wondering if this was an accepted American English usage.
Also, thank you for clarifying "blond/blonde". I see both used without a gender bias so often that I was starting to think I must be wrong in spelling it one way for men and one for women...
And one more thing: if the second person form is "hast" and the third person is "hath", is the first person merely "has", or is there another word?
February 6 2004, 18:33:10 UTC 9 years ago
Re:
First person = HAVE. Not has. ACK. *headdesk* Same question without cold-induced idiocy.9 years ago
9 years ago
9 years ago
9 years ago
9 years ago
9 years ago
9 years ago
9 years ago
8 years ago
February 6 2004, 19:51:06 UTC 9 years ago
February 6 2004, 21:32:55 UTC 9 years ago
Could you tell me..
What school and level do you teach at?February 6 2004, 22:15:18 UTC 9 years ago
February 6 2004, 22:39:55 UTC 9 years ago
Does 'shinning' used as an adjective sound to anyone else like a milder form of shitting? I can just imagine some disgruntled farmer exclaiming "That shinning unicorn!"
February 7 2004, 03:20:00 UTC 9 years ago
Re:
That's not Old English. Old English, more properly called Anglo-Saxon, is more along the lines ofFæder ure þu þe eart on heofonum;
Si þin nama gehalgod
to becume þin rice
gewurþe ðin willa
on eorðan swa swa on heofonum.
urne gedæghwamlican hlaf syle us todæg
and forgyf us ure gyltas
swa swa we forgyfað urum gyltendum
and ne gelæd þu us on costnunge
ac alys us of yfele soþlice
Which, if you couldn't tell (I doubt you could), is the Lord's Prayer. What you're referring to is really "archaic English". You can call it Middle English if you like, but that really implies Chacer's English. And now I will shut up and rant about this in my own journal, because I know you really don't care.
9 years ago
9 years ago
9 years ago
February 6 2004, 22:42:16 UTC 9 years ago
February 6 2004, 22:57:26 UTC 9 years ago
Not too good when some kind of atmosphere is being attempted :-)
February 7 2004, 03:02:37 UTC 9 years ago
And I have rarely, if ever, seen the form "blond" in actual writing. What you pointed out is a distiction no one really cares about, and most likely will be obsolete before you die. Sorry.
But misuse of these words can get irksome, I agree.
February 7 2004, 03:04:29 UTC 9 years ago
Gah
You did say that about wrought -- I just missed it. I really shouldn't post when I'm this out of it.9 years ago
9 years ago
February 7 2004, 14:00:50 UTC 9 years ago
February 13 2004, 08:22:51 UTC 9 years ago
Ichor...
Thanks for the invaluable list.Actually, in modern Greek, I have seem ichor and words that derive from the same root being used when referring to any thick bodily fluid.
In any case, I too had somehow related this word with Lovecraft..
May 26 2007, 19:51:17 UTC 5 years ago
Re: Ichor...
Thick bodily fluid...squick...February 17 2004, 02:27:35 UTC 9 years ago
Chalcedony
You can't really make a sword out of chalcedony, not a practical one, at least. It is a rather brittle mineral. I am from the Urals and we use this variety of stone quite extensively in decorating building, in figurines, and in costume jewellery.February 17 2004, 02:31:10 UTC 9 years ago
Can't deal with my mouse today
blame punching darn capsules, 30 capsules with starch as a filler, punched by hand. My hands can't adjust to another kind of motion.I meant, of course, that you were right saying that one can't make a chalcedony sword. I am not too sure if it would be heavier than steel, though... And I would assume one can decorate handle/scabbard/armor with it.
I found your list very useful, English being neither my first nor even my second language. Flaunt/flout was especially useful, as I have never heard "flout" before. In fact, I haven't heard shinning or ichor before either.
*hugs*
April 7 2005, 10:43:28 UTC 8 years ago
February 11 2006, 22:35:50 UTC 7 years ago
July 27 2006, 20:16:04 UTC 6 years ago
The result was that finding the "blond/blonde" thing mentioned in your rant sent me storming up and down the room for a while, frustrated with myself. :D
I'm also rather annoyed that I have a scene in another novel-idea where the word 'ichor' would be perfectly appropriate... but the only character there really capable of talking probably doesn't know that word.
(Sorry that I'm posting so long after the last post was made, but I wanted to make the comment.)
November 17 2006, 16:57:08 UTC 6 years ago
January 12 2007, 18:05:34 UTC 6 years ago
December 27 2007, 00:18:51 UTC 5 years ago
October 24 2011, 04:37:40 UTC 1 year ago
November 24 2011, 06:29:49 UTC 1 year ago
I have to throw in one thing, though, just as something of a horse-person: bay can actually have a very wide range of colors. It's essentially "brown(ish) with black mane and tail," but that brown can range from a new-penny-copper all the way down to "seal bay," which is effectively black unless you see it in direct sunlight. [/nitpick]
December 6 2011, 03:34:10 UTC 1 year ago
"Flaunt the law"
Oh boy. I'm pretty sure I know EXACTLY why that one pops up so much. Many of these younger writers played Dungeons and Dragons when they were younger. And as it happens, the Advanced Dungeons and Dragons 2nd Edition Dungeon Master's Guide used flaunt where they meant flout in a section cautioning DMs against letting players start their characters off as nobility. One of the things it said such players might do is have their character "flaunt the law". The word that should have been there was "flout", but "flaunt" was used instead and none of the editors caught it. And so people saw the misuse at a young age and it stuck in their minds. The word not being common in pop media meant those not inclined to double-check via dictionary didn't have correct usage elsewhere to set them straight, so...