This rant isn't connected to much of anything at all...except, perhaps, the people I've met online who believe they're shapeshifters, and the way that shapeshifting is often used in fantasy.
One thing that puzzles me is how often shapeshifting can be used to complicate the plot of a fantasy novel, and how little it is. The person who becomes an animal is represented as a threatening beast, a ravening thing with all humanity gone who only wants to prey on the kind he was born into. Or, if it's the kind of shapeshifter who can assume more than two forms- say, the Changeling in Terry Brooks's The Elfstones of Shannara- then the element becomes one of deception and intrigue, but still of threat. The shapeshifter, werewolf or demon or changeling or whatever term is used, is apparently intent on destroying human society. So humans have to band together and kill the threat.
It's the opposite in most of the online world of people who think of themselves as shapeshifters. I've read a number of webpages written by "weres" (also called shifters, therianthropes, and other names) who have declared themselves superior to humans, and who want to go back to the animal form they believe their soul belongs to. They would abandon everything- intelligence, art, human family, everything- for a chance to run on four feet. There, people who think of themselves as human are represented as horrible, destructive, stupid, or at least ignorant. "Mundanes" is the usual term, and in some of the shapeshifters' eyes, they only deserve to be abandoned or even killed.
Why these two simplistic views- one devoted to the human world, the other to the animal?
It doesn't make sense to me, because it seems that the shapeshifter could be so powerful a symbol of both. He can flow back and forth when he wishes, having the best of both worlds. I could easily see the thrill of writing about such a being, or even, if I were different, believing myself to be one. You have the freedom to run faster and be stronger than any human can be, and more beautiful than many humans are. Yet you also have the ability to think and create art and live comfortably. Not the forest or the house, but both.
Maybe it's this complexity that dulls the shining symbol down in the legends, the animal into a ravening beast and the human into an ignorant environment-destroyer. Either of those does make a compelling story. I personally feel the shapeshifter crossing boundaries makes a more compelling one, but perhaps it also makes people nervous. Black-and-white thinking, the bifurcation fallacy, is comfortable and has a lot of power of its own. I've seen it in people on all sides of the political spectrum, even when they're perfectly aware of the divisions and complexities in their own side; they simply decide that they are complex, individual, and worthy of being cared about, while the other side is dumb and one-dimensional. Pro-choicers and pro-lifers, Democrats and Republicans, feminists and anti-feminists, people in stories and people who believe they're shapeshifters- it's easier that way.
Which affords me a little bitter amusement, since by dividing the world up into the worthy and the unworthy, the "weres" are acting very, very human.
To use the language of academia, maybe shapeshifters are "transgressive," and people find it hard to deal with that-
Or maybe they just freak people out. *shrug*
June 15 2003, 16:23:52 UTC 8 years ago
June 15 2003, 18:16:13 UTC 8 years ago
You'd think that people who are really "better than human" would be above human foibles.
June 15 2003, 17:33:28 UTC 8 years ago
--Maria the Mischevious
P.S. Thanks for the code!
June 15 2003, 18:13:37 UTC 8 years ago
P.S. You're welcome!
June 16 2003, 06:04:02 UTC 8 years ago
So I suppose it has a lot to do with what the writer - and the reader- wants out of the ability to transform. I just saw it as an ability, whereas my friend saw it as a way of escape. Personally I'm quite fond of the human world and see no need to escape it... ^_^
As a random aside, I find the Animagi in the Harry Potter books interesting for that reason - they are merely _people_ who transform into another shape. And then there's the contrast with Lupin's werewolf, over which he has no control at all. ... I _will_ shut up now. :)
June 16 2003, 06:54:57 UTC 8 years ago
The image of animals as dumb and simplistic creatures is wrong, of course, but it seems that some people just take that image and apply it to humans in reverse, which I think is wrong as well.
June 16 2003, 08:46:25 UTC 8 years ago
June 16 2003, 09:08:34 UTC 8 years ago
I see nothing wrong with such beliefs in themselves, but when people with those beliefs start pitying the "mundanes" or actively promoting themselves as superior, then I think I should have the right to pity them back.
January 10 2004, 03:25:08 UTC 8 years ago
She's got cerebral palsy, which may go some way toward explaining that.
She and I were writing a novel together. It never really got finished because we had a fight over it (so sad) but we inserted ourselves into it. Sort of. Well, yes, we did and I'm not ashamed of it! Hah so there!
Um...anyway. It was basically an RPG thing we did during lunch, but I think it was pretty OK.
The basis was as such: A fantasy world--but as far removed from, say, Tolkien or Dragonlance as our world today is from Chaucer's time. In short, a world with high school and suburbs, but at the same time retaining slight vestiges of fantasy. Most of the dragons and such had been killed off, or simply evolved. Magic works and is taught in high schools as just another subject, like math.
Tamara is a werewolf. By day she goes to school, and by night runs with her pack. She takes things very seriously, including love; she's in love with one of her wolf friends but since she's an alpha she's not supposed to love. Or something. Her brother is a government worker, and he's trying to marry her off to the governor, who's corrupt and lazy and annoying. To his credit, the brother really thinks he's doing the right thing; he's in awe of his boss and he thinks that if Tamara settles down she's be happier.
Rozita is a werewolf as well; she's Tamara's best friend. (That was me.) She never had a pack; her family isn't werewolves. She was just bit by one when she was younger. She tried to join Tamara's pack, but didn't really like hunting and sleeping outdoors, so that didn't work. She doesn't take things nearly as seriously as Tamara does, and is slightly lazier and less idealistic. She also has a slight crush on Tamara.
For some reason, Tamara gets it into her head that "the wolf goddess" has given her pack a destiny, and inspires them to leave the city and go out to establish a colony in the woods. Rozita, Tamara's brother, and the governor all try to stop them, but of course to no avail.
The first year that the pack is out in the wild, they nearly starve. They refuse to return to the city and instead go to another city, which they like better for some reason. This city happens to be fighting the first city, and soon the governor of the new city enlists the pack to go fight the first city...
Yeah.
March 6 2007, 01:55:28 UTC 5 years ago
However, because no one has brought up this point before, I feel the need to contest your simplification of all this. I want to discourage inaccuracies and generalizations about people. In this case, I assume that the reason you dismiss therianthropy as bad (I wouldn't feel safe saying you thought these people were pretending or whining or insane, but I do feel safe saying you paint an ugly picture) is because of lack of information. Websites dealing with real 'weres' or therianthropes are few an far between. It's easier to come upon the angrier ones, because they're louder, more annoying, and already looking for attention. Those who are not angry, just trying to express themselves, and have a stronger sense of etiquette are more likely to hide away. Thus, it's easy to find whiners, harder to find people who really are normal, just with some nonhuman in there.
Here's the crash course:
-It is widely agreed that anyone who wants to pretend they're not human and whines about it on the internet is ignoring the very fingers that allow their whining to be viewed by all. Therianthropes are human, every single one of us. We are animalpeople, but the animal part doesn't make the human go away or take a backseat. For example, where a cat would hear noise, I hear music, and where a human would see movement, I see prey.
-The idea of turning into a big, bad, scary predator is appealing in one way or another. It is even more so appealing to that theoretical person with too much time, not enough distractions and an internet connection. This means that being a were is attractive enough that a certain amount of people fake it for whatever the hell their reasons are.
-It is very widely agreed that no one can become a therianthrope. It is something you are born with.
-Considering that most therianthropes function in life, hold jobs, and have relationships, with the same variation in happiness that everyone experiences, there's nothing very different between 'normal' people and therianthropes (and really, one's species identification is hardly the first that comes to mind when anyone thinks about normal vs. weird). We see life through another filter, but everyone has a different perspective and different filters on how they live.
-No one, not anyone, who isn't lying, selling something, or delusional, will never seriously claim to be able to physically turn into anything, ever.
I know this post I old, I know this is unlikely to be read, but I think this had to be said.
June 2 2010, 21:05:20 UTC 1 year ago
Hear! Hear!
I know it's also prob not going to be heard, but I found this and yes. it fits.Thanks for showing me the sensical view.
January 26 2010, 02:38:40 UTC 2 years ago
so this is pretty good for me as a guide on how to make it right.
One thing that came up my mind after reading most of this post. We should
never forget, that mankind is an animal as well, yet only more intelligent
than other lifeforms.
January 27 2011, 23:35:04 UTC 1 year ago
Duels between shapeshifters always fascinated me, far more than basic fight scenes.
I can't stand people who romanticize animals. Yes, wolves are cool; they are also vicious and lustful and greedy and all the things that humans are. They are not "noble" or "pure" any more than humans are noble--but at the same time, part of me wants to believe in the idealized, symbolic animal as a standard to hold myself to.
Just so long as we can differentiate between the ideal and the physical, there's nothing wrong with using animals to represent positive traits that should be emulated. (On the other hand, putting down humans universally as stupid, brutish, and ignorant is wrong on so many levels. Who said that humans are "both angels and demons"?)